Get a Free Quote

Our representative will contact you soon.
Email
Mobile/WhatsApp
Name
Company Name
Message
0/1000
Back

Why Did This AHU Lose 20% Airflow After Just One Month?

Why Did This AHU Lose 20% Airflow After Just One Month?

Case Study: Why Did This AHU Lose 20% Airflow After Just One Month?

By Dannis Luo, Application Engineering — FANOVA MOTOR2026-07-128 min read
AHU Fan Case Study EC Axial Fan FG3G350-2APL-90 VAV HVAC
ClientCommercial AHU Manufacturer (South China)
ApplicationOffice Building Air Handling Unit
ProblemSupply airflow dropped 20% after one month
Root CauseFixed-speed AC fan unable to compensate for multi-stage dynamic resistance
SolutionFG3G350-2APL-90 EC axial fan (350mm·160W·230VAC)
ResultAirflow restored to 100%·400+ kWh annual savings·VAV-ready

1. The Problem: Passed Factory Test, Failed in the Field

Last fall, a commercial AHU manufacturer with over a decade of experience reached out: "Dannis, our AHU hits the airflow target perfectly during factory testing. But after a month on site, airflow drops 20%. We've tried three fan suppliers—same AC axial fan specs—and they all do the same thing. Is it the fans, or is it us?"

He sent over the AHU configuration: mixing section + G4 pre-filter + F7 bag filter + cooling coil + heating coil + humidifier + fan section—a textbook commercial office AHU, design airflow 3,000 m³/h, using a 350mm AC induction motor axial fan running at fixed speed with no speed control.

At factory test, every section was brand new: pre-filter pressure drop 50 Pa, cooling coil dry-operation 80 Pa, humidifier off. Total system resistance: ~180 Pa. Fan was operating comfortably in its rated zone. Airflow: 3,000 m³/h. Passed.

One month later, on site: pre-filter loaded to 120 Pa, cooling coil running wet (actual cooling mode) at 150 Pa, humidifier active at 30 Pa. Total system resistance: 350 Pa—nearly double the factory test value. And the AC fan? No speed control. Operating point slid left along the PQ curve. Airflow dropped from 3,000 m³/h to 2,400 m³/h.

First take: The fans weren't faulty. All three suppliers were fine. The fundamental flaw was in the selection logic—the fan was sized for factory-new conditions only, with no provision for in-field variable resistance.

2. Diagnosis: It Wasn't the Fan's Fault

The root cause becomes clear when you plot system resistance over time:

Timeline Condition Filter Coil Humidifier Total Resistance Airflow
Factory test New·Dry coil 50 Pa 80 Pa 0 Pa ~180 Pa 3,000 m³/h ✅
1 month in Filter loading·Wet coil 120 Pa 150 Pa 30 Pa ~350 Pa 2,400 m³/h ❌
6 months in Filter end-of-life·Wet coil 200 Pa 150 Pa 30 Pa ~430 Pa 1,800 m³/h ❌

An AHU is not a static system. Filters load, cooling coils switch from dry to wet operation, humidifiers cycle on and off—every one of these changes alters the resistance the fan sees. A fixed-speed AC fan has exactly one degree of freedom on its PQ curve: resistance rises → operating point shifts left → airflow drops. Without speed control, it can only follow the curve downhill.

The fix didn't require a larger fan, a VFD, or a redesigned AHU cabinet. It required one thing: a motor that can adjust its speed in response to changing resistance—an EC motor.

3. The Solution: FG3G350-2APL-90

We recommended the FG3G350-2APL-90—same diameter (350mm), same voltage (230VAC), same airflow class (3,500 m³/h), but with the AC induction motor replaced by a BLEC92 external rotor EC brushless motor with native 0-10V/PWM variable-speed control.

Key Design Features for This Case

Design Element Selected Why It Mattered Here
Fan type Axial (G-type·guarded) High flow·axial discharge·matches AHU airflow direction
Motor type EC brushless (BLEC92) Native 0-10V/PWM speed control·stepless·no VFD needed
Voltage 230VAC Direct mains connection·no external DC supply required
Impeller diameter 350mm Same dimensions as original—zero AHU cabinet modifications

FG3G350-2APL-90 Full Specifications

Parameter Value Note
Model FG3G350-2APL-90 PL electrical·90 mechanical series
Fan category Axial fan (with guard grille) G-type
Impeller diameter 350 mm
Rated voltage 230 VAC 50/60Hz
Rated speed 1,580 RPM 0-10V/PWM stepless speed control
Max airflow 3,500 m³/h Free-air condition
Max static pressure 135 Pa Zero-flow condition
Rated power 160 W Full load
Rated current 1.15 A At 230VAC
Sound pressure level 63 dB(A) Rated condition·1m
Motor type BLEC92 3-phase EC brushless·external rotor
Speed control 0-10VDC / PWM Standard
Protection rating IP44 Indoor AHU installation
Operating temperature -25 ~ +60 ℃

4. The Key Decision: Why EC Instead of AC

The client asked the obvious question: "Same impeller size, EC costs more than AC. Is it worth it?"

We gave him a comparison table and three decision criteria:

Metric Original: AC Induction Motor New: EC Brushless (BLEC92) Difference
Full-load efficiency ~55-65% >85% 30-40% energy saving
Speed control range Fixed / requires VFD 0-100% stepless·native VFD cost eliminated
Starting current 5-7× rated <1.2× rated Minimal grid impact
Power factor 0.6-0.75 >0.95 Low reactive losses
Noise 68-72 dB(A) 63 dB(A) 5-9 dB quieter
Service life 20,000-30,000h 40,000-60,000h 2× lifespan

Three dimensions that decided this case:
① Speed control is mandatory, not optional: This AHU's multi-stage dynamic resistance meant the fan had to have speed control. The total cost of AC motor + VFD + control cabinet + wiring + commissioning actually exceeded the all-in-one EC solution.
② Noise-sensitive location: The AHU room was directly adjacent to office space. 72 dB(A) AC → 63 dB(A) EC. That 9 dB difference meant one less stage of sound attenuation—and the savings on the silencer roughly covered the EC price premium.
③ VAV-ready for future projects: The client had upcoming projects requiring variable air volume. With AC+VFD architecture, upgrading to VAV means reworking the control logic. With EC, the 0-10V/PWM interface connects directly to the DDC—switching from CAV to VAV requires zero changes to the fan section.

5. Validation: Operating Points on the PQ Curve

Every selection must survive the PQ curve. Here's the FG3G350-2APL-90 at 1,580 RPM, overlaid with this case's actual system resistance profile:

Operating Point Airflow (m³/h) Static Pressure (Pa) Corresponding Case Condition
Free air 3,500 0 — (theoretical maximum)
Rated point ⭐ ~1,750 ~70 Factory-new·dry coil → speed can be reduced
1 month in ~3,000 ~90 EC ramps to ~85% speed·airflow pulled back to design
6 months in ~3,000 ~110 EC ramps to ~95% speed·still within rated zone
Shutoff 0 135 Maximum static pressure·zero flow

Conclusion: The FG3G350-2APL-90, with 135 Pa maximum static pressure, keeps the operating point within its rated zone even as system resistance reaches 2.4× the original design value. Where the AC fan had already dropped to 2,400 m³/h, the EC fan—with closed-loop speed control—pulls airflow back to 3,000 m³/h while staying comfortably below 90% of maximum speed.

6. Results: Before vs. After

The client retrofitted one prototype AHU with the FG3G350-2APL-90, paired with a 0-10V static pressure sensor for closed-loop control. After a full 6-month filter cycle, here's what they reported:

3,000 → 3,000
m³/h · Airflow

Zero decay over full filter cycle. EC closed-loop control automatically compensated for filter loading and wet coil conditions.

−400+
kWh/year · Saved

160W vs. ~250W original. 12 h/day operation. 400-500 kWh annual saving per unit.

−9 dB
Noise Reduction

63 vs. 72 dB(A). AHU room adjacent to offices. Noise complaints stopped.

0
Service Calls · 6 Months

Original AC required quarterly belt tensioning. EC direct-drive: zero maintenance.

Metric Before (AC Fixed-Speed) After (EC Variable-Speed)
Factory airflow 3,000 m³/h 3,000 m³/h (speed reduced to match)
Airflow after 6 months 1,800 m³/h (-40%) 3,000 m³/h (closed-loop compensation·zero decay)
Input power (operating) ~250 W ~160 W
Noise @1m 72 dB(A) 63 dB(A)
Speed control None 0-10VDC direct to DDC
Maintenance interval Quarterly (belt tension) Maintenance-free (direct drive·no belts)

The client has since specified the FG3G350-2APL-90 in three follow-up projects and is evaluating its larger-airflow variants for another product line.

7. Lessons Learned: Four Things We'd Do Again

This project taught us several things worth sharing:

  1. Size AHU fans for "dirtiest filter + wettest coil"—not factory-new dry conditions. Passing the factory test means nothing if you can't hold airflow when the filters load and the coil goes wet. Both are predictable. Design for them.
  2. AC motor + VFD total cost > EC all-in-one. Don't get hung up on the EC motor's unit price. Add up the AC motor + VFD + control cabinet space + wiring + commissioning—the EC integrated solution comes out cheaper, and it's one supplier to manage instead of three.
  3. Keep the 0-10V signal cable in a separate trunking from the 230V power line. We've seen too many projects where the speed control signal and mains power are bundled together, and the DDC reads 50Hz interference instead of an RPM signal. Shielded cable + separate trunking. Costs almost nothing. Saves a callback.
  4. Allow 1.5× impeller diameter of straight duct upstream of the fan inlet. For the FG3G350, that's 525mm. Inlet flow distortion eats 15-25% of your airflow—more than the EC motor saves you in energy. A straight section or a turning vane is the cheapest performance gain you'll ever spec.

8. FG3G350 Platform Quick Reference

If you're working on a similar AHU project, here's the full FG3G350 platform matrix:

Model Motor Voltage Max Airflow Max Pressure Power Noise Best For
FG3G350-2APL-90 EC 230VAC 3,500 m³/h 135 Pa 160W 63dB AHU standard·EC speed control·this case
FG3G350-2AGL-90 AC 230VAC 3,500 m³/h 135 Pa AHU CAV·budget-sensitive
FG3G350-2APN-90 EC 230VAC 3,500 m³/h 135 Pa 160W 63dB PN electrical·drop-in alternative
FG3G350-48PL-90 EC 48VDC 3,500 m³/h 135 Pa 160W 63dB DC-powered·special applications

Selection note: PL and PN have different speed-control signal polarities. Wire them backwards and the fan runs at minimum speed regardless of the control signal. Confirm your DDC output type before ordering.

Dealing with AHU airflow decay? Need the full PQ curve data for FG3G350-2APL-90 to validate against your system? Contact our application engineering team: [email protected]. Send us your AHU section configuration and resistance estimates—we'll run the PQ matching for you.

F

FANOVA MOTOR · fanovamotor.com · Case Study · FG3G350-2APL-90 · 2026-07-12

Prev

None

ALL

SS316 Centrifugal Impeller for Mine Ventilation — Explosion-Proof by Design

Next
Recommended Products

Get a Free Quote

Our representative will contact you soon.
Email
Mobile/WhatsApp
Name
Company Name
Message
0/1000